Skoda Enyaq 60 2023

Skoda Enyaq 60 2023 compares with 503 SUVs and leans toward slower acceleration and a smaller usable battery. 0–100 km/h is slower than the class median; 8.7 s vs 6.6 s; 2.1 s slower, +32%. Usable battery capacity is below the class median; 58 kWh vs 77 kWh; 19 kWh lower, -25%. Peak DC power is below the class median; 124 kW vs 150 kW; 26 kW lower, -17%. Main trade-off: slower acceleration and a smaller usable battery.

Real range estimates The values shown here are estimates calculated by BEV-Database using WLTP data and the usable battery capacity of the car. Mild weather represents driving in roughly +20 +25 C without heavy use of climate control, while Cold weather reflects winter conditions with cabin heating. Highway assumes steady cruising at about 110 km/h. These figures are not official test results. Real-world range will vary depending on speed, temperature, traffic, road profile, payload, tyres and driving style.

Source: Manufacturer

Home / Destination

Charging Type	Type 2
Port Location	Rear Right
Charge Power	11 kW
Charge Time AC (0-100%)	6 h 0 min
Charge Speed (mild)	60 km/h
Charge Speed (cold)	50 km/h

Fast Charging

Fast Charging Port	CCS Combo 2
Port Location	Rear Right
Charge Power (max)	124 kW
Charge Power (10-80%)	82 kW
Charge Time DC (10-80%)	30 min
Charge Speed (mild)	530 km/h
Charge Speed (cold)	390 km/h
Autocharge Supported	No

Plug & Charge

Preconditioning

Vehicle-to-Load (V2L)

Vehicle-to-Home (V2H)

Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G)

BEVDB model

BEVDB estimates use WLTP-rated (or derived) consumption and usable battery capacity to model city/highway ranges; the combined value averages the four scenarios.

WLTP Ratings (best case)

WLTP Ratings (worst case)

Source: Euro NCAP